Mitchell Hamline School of Law

From TLS wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell Hamline research was completed on 2026-08-30. Successor-school figures retain their own cohorts, and predecessor-history integration remains subject to live-title and staged-render approval.

Status notice for the minnesota merger record Operating private Council-approved law school in St. Paul, formed by the December 2015 combination of William Mitchell and Hamline. [1][2][3][4]

Mitchell Hamline School of Law is a private, Council-approved law school in St. Paul, Minnesota. It was created in December 2015 through the combination of William Mitchell College of Law and Hamline University School of Law.[1]

Key Takeaways — Minnesota Merger Record

  • Mitchell Hamline is the current school formed by the 2015 combination of William Mitchell and Hamline.
  • Its 2025–2026 academic-year report distinguishes full-time and part-time tuition and shows a first-year class weighted toward part-time enrollment.
  • The grants table contains a count inconsistency, so this draft does not manufacture a recipient percentage.

At a Glance — Minnesota Merger Record

Minnesota Merger Record field Verified minnesota merger record information
Canonical title in the minnesota merger record Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Location for the minnesota merger record St. Paul, Minnesota
Approval pathway for the minnesota merger record Council-approved since the 2015 combination
Admissions scope for the minnesota merger record Full-time and part-time first-year enrollment reported in the 2025 Standard 509 report.
TLS treatment for the minnesota merger record current canonical
Research cutoff: 2026-08-30 Project verification date; source reporting periods remain separately labeled.

Identity and Status — Minnesota Merger Record

William Mitchell is a predecessor identity, not a separately admitting current school. The canonical page should preserve both predecessor histories while using Mitchell Hamline's current disclosures for admissions, costs, scholarships, and outcomes.


History — Minnesota Merger Record

William Mitchell and Hamline each had separate legal-education histories. Their December 2015 combination created Mitchell Hamline School of Law, which the 2025 Standard 509 report lists as Council-approved since 2015.[1]

Admissions and Student Data — Minnesota Merger Record

Minnesota Merger Record measure Verified result Applicable reporting period
Completed applications 1,603 2025 entering class[3]
Offers 824 2025 entering class[3]
Acceptance rate 51.40% 2025 entering class[3]
First-year class 364 (137 full-time; 227 part-time) 2025 entering class[3]
LSAT 25th / median / 75th 151 / 154 / 158 2025 entering class[3]
UGPA 25th / median / 75th 2.96 / 3.29 / 3.60 2025 entering class[3]
Full-time tuition / fees $55,300 / $1,000 2025–2026[3]
Part-time tuition / fees $39,930 / $1,000 2025–2026[3]
Conditional scholarships None reported 2024–2025[3]

Applications, offers, acceptance, first-year enrollment, LSAT, and GPA values are taken from Mitchell Hamline's 2025 Standard 509 report. William Mitchell and Hamline predecessor admissions data remain historical and separate.

Tuition, Fees, and Scholarships — Minnesota Merger Record

For the 2025–2026 academic year, the report separately lists full-time and part-time tuition and reports $16,848 in estimated off-campus living expenses. The grants table contains counts that exceed the stated student total in some columns; the draft does not convert that source anomaly into a percentage claim.[3]

Full-time and part-time tuition are different, and estimated living expense is reported separately. Scholarship evaluation should use the student's actual schedule and resolve the source-table count anomaly before publishing a grant-recipient share.

Employment Outcomes — Minnesota Merger Record

Use current Mitchell Hamline employment and bar reports. William Mitchell or Hamline predecessor results may appear only in a clearly dated history section and should never be substituted for current outcomes.

Current analysis must use a Mitchell Hamline graduating-class disclosure. William Mitchell or Hamline outcomes can appear only as dated predecessor history, not as evidence of current placement.

Bar Passage — Minnesota Merger Record

The bar report must identify Mitchell Hamline's applicable cohort and distinguish first-time from ultimate outcomes. Pre-combination results cannot be blended into the successor's rate.

Academics and Programs — Minnesota Merger Record

The current school serves full-time and part-time students. Program format, on-campus requirements, sequencing, and time-to-degree should be checked against Mitchell Hamline's catalog for the applicant's intended schedule.

Student Experience and Location — Minnesota Merger Record

The institution is based in St. Paul. Housing, travel, and schedule analysis should reflect the student's actual format, especially when a part-time pathway changes time on campus.

Comparison and Decision Guidance — Minnesota Merger Record

Compare Mitchell Hamline on program pace, total semesters, full-time or part-time tuition, written aid terms, and current outcomes. William Mitchell is a predecessor search term, not a separate current offer.

TLS Assessment — Minnesota Merger Record

The format decision drives both time and cost. Applicants should model the full path to graduation under the intended schedule and verify how scholarships interact with that pace.

Minnesota Merger Record Release and Enrollment Checks — Minnesota Merger Record

  • Compare full-time and part-time structures, pacing, and total program cost.
  • Verify the scholarship amount against the current billing pattern and renewal terms.
  • Use current Mitchell Hamline outcomes rather than predecessor figures.
  • Treat William Mitchell as a search alias and history term only.

Frequently Asked Questions — Minnesota Merger Record

Does William Mitchell still admit a separate class?

No. William Mitchell is a predecessor of Mitchell Hamline.

Why are full-time and part-time costs shown separately?

The 2025–2026 academic-year disclosure publishes different tuition figures, and the correct comparison depends on the student's schedule.

Why is no grant-recipient percentage stated?

The source table's counts are internally inconsistent; a percentage would imply precision the report does not support without review.

Methodology and Sources — Minnesota Merger Record

The official combination notice and ABA archive establish the successor identity. Current figures come from the 2025 Standard 509 report, with the grants-table anomaly preserved as a human-review blocker.

References — Minnesota Merger Record