My comment about criminal charges and it's relation to being a lawyer is serious. Don't you listen to the news? Ever heard of Watergate? They were all lawyers. Clinton going through everyones FBI file at the White House? A lawyer. Enron? Lawyers. The banks? Who do you think advises those scum?
The state Bar never disciplines a lawyer unless it's so flagrant they have no choice, YET if you drank beer when you were 19, well maybe you're not fit to be a lawyer?
If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why Forum
-
jackster2
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:22 pm
-
reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Agreed.jackster2 wrote:My comment about criminal charges and it's relation to being a lawyer is serious. Don't you listen to the news? Ever heard of Watergate? They were all lawyers. Clinton going through everyones FBI file at the White House? A lawyer. Enron? Lawyers. The banks? Who do you think advises those scum?
The state Bar never disciplines a lawyer unless it's so flagrant they have no choice, YET if you drank beer when you were 19, well maybe you're not fit to be a lawyer?
How about Spitzer - Harvard Law, 180 LSAT, loves hookers. Maybe ABA should ask, "what are your thoughts on hookers" during character/fitness.
-
Puffy
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:04 am
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
what... what's wrong with hookers?reasonabledoubt wrote:Agreed.jackster2 wrote:My comment about criminal charges and it's relation to being a lawyer is serious. Don't you listen to the news? Ever heard of Watergate? They were all lawyers. Clinton going through everyones FBI file at the White House? A lawyer. Enron? Lawyers. The banks? Who do you think advises those scum?
The state Bar never disciplines a lawyer unless it's so flagrant they have no choice, YET if you drank beer when you were 19, well maybe you're not fit to be a lawyer?
How about Spitzer - Harvard Law, 180 LSAT, loves hookers. Maybe ABA should ask, "what are your thoughts on hookers" during character/fitness.
-
JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Any and all law schools that require Need Access.
-
reasonable_man
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Face Punch List:
Brooklyn Law School - 45k per year for a school that places slightly better than hofstra? Come on.
New York Law School - See Above
Hofstra - See MTV's Jersey Shore
Every school founded after 2000 - Thanks, but we already have too many law schools in the US.
Suffolk - See Brooklyn Law School above (and for some reason, people think this place is a fucking prestige pit)
NESL - See above
Any school below the top 30 charging as much as most of the schools within the top 30 - See Brooklyn Law School above
Brooklyn Law School - 45k per year for a school that places slightly better than hofstra? Come on.
New York Law School - See Above
Hofstra - See MTV's Jersey Shore
Every school founded after 2000 - Thanks, but we already have too many law schools in the US.
Suffolk - See Brooklyn Law School above (and for some reason, people think this place is a fucking prestige pit)
NESL - See above
Any school below the top 30 charging as much as most of the schools within the top 30 - See Brooklyn Law School above
-
lawyerlover
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:55 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
completely agreed - they will make it impossible for meJusticeHarlan wrote:Any and all law schools that require Need Access.
-
galahad85
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:50 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
+1JusticeHarlan wrote:Any and all law schools that require Need Access.
-
reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Primarily NY/east coast punch list, loves to punch a lot, Brooklyn's in the house.... Mike Tyson, is that you!? You're going to LS!? Uh oh, watch out though, per another thread I'm sure people are going to raise a stink about you being a convicted rapist. Anyways, knock'em out Mike.reasonable_man wrote:Face Punch List:
Brooklyn Law School - 45k per year for a school that places slightly better than hofstra? Come on.
New York Law School - See Above
Hofstra - See MTV's Jersey Shore
Every school founded after 2000 - Thanks, but we already have too many law schools in the US.
Suffolk - See Brooklyn Law School above (and for some reason, people think this place is a fucking prestige pit)
NESL - See above
Any school below the top 30 charging as much as most of the schools within the top 30 - See Brooklyn Law School above
-
dutchstriker
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Even more impressive considering it only went up to 48 back then.reasonabledoubt wrote: How about Spitzer - Harvard Law, 180 LSAT, loves hookers. Maybe ABA should ask, "what are your thoughts on hookers" during character/fitness.
Edit: Or it may have been on the 200-800 scale. In which case Harvard had some really low standards back in the day.
Last edited by dutchstriker on Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
reasonable_man
- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
I believe Mike might have been from the bronx..reasonabledoubt wrote:Primarily NY/east coast punch list, loves to punch a lot, Brooklyn's in the house.... Mike Tyson, is that you!? You're going to LS!? Uh oh, watch out though, per another thread I'm sure people are going to raise a stink about you being a convicted rapist. Anyways, knock'em out Mike.reasonable_man wrote:Face Punch List:
Brooklyn Law School - 45k per year for a school that places slightly better than hofstra? Come on.
New York Law School - See Above
Hofstra - See MTV's Jersey Shore
Every school founded after 2000 - Thanks, but we already have too many law schools in the US.
Suffolk - See Brooklyn Law School above (and for some reason, people think this place is a fucking prestige pit)
NESL - See above
Any school below the top 30 charging as much as most of the schools within the top 30 - See Brooklyn Law School above
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
ornbarn
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:59 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
no one has said cooley yet?
-
Belili
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:10 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Columbia - because I attend NYU and am contractually obligated to hate CLS.
-
reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Hey take it easy Mr. editor... my mistake, but I read he got a perfect lsat score. Sorry about using the wrong scoring scale. I just punched you in the face for your tone.dutchstriker wrote:Even more impressive considering it only went up to 48 back then.reasonabledoubt wrote: How about Spitzer - Harvard Law, 180 LSAT, loves hookers. Maybe ABA should ask, "what are your thoughts on hookers" during character/fitness.
Edit: Or it may have been on the 200-800 scale. In which case Harvard had some really low standards back in the day.
-
reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
He did live at Bedford–Stuyvesant, Brooklyn.reasonable_man wrote:I believe Mike might have been from the bronx..reasonabledoubt wrote:Primarily NY/east coast punch list, loves to punch a lot, Brooklyn's in the house.... Mike Tyson, is that you!? You're going to LS!? Uh oh, watch out though, per another thread I'm sure people are going to raise a stink about you being a convicted rapist. Anyways, knock'em out Mike.reasonable_man wrote:Face Punch List:
Brooklyn Law School - 45k per year for a school that places slightly better than hofstra? Come on.
New York Law School - See Above
Hofstra - See MTV's Jersey Shore
Every school founded after 2000 - Thanks, but we already have too many law schools in the US.
Suffolk - See Brooklyn Law School above (and for some reason, people think this place is a fucking prestige pit)
NESL - See above
Any school below the top 30 charging as much as most of the schools within the top 30 - See Brooklyn Law School above
-
nyyankees
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:50 am
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
any law school that spams with "admissions" as the sender. I understand its a fair title, but i get soo excited anytime i see something from admissions only to find out its admissions at st thomas
-
StyrofoamWar
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:16 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Every single school that claims rolling admissions, but then randomly reviews applications in no order at all and actually seems to avoid early applicants like the plague.
-
09042014
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
What?chadwick218 wrote:WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
holydonkey
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
+1Desert Fox wrote:What?chadwick218 wrote:WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Again, I had deposited. Although WUSTL has no strict policy against depositing at multiple, some schools do ...Desert Fox wrote:What?chadwick218 wrote:WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
09042014
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Did you deposit at NU as well?chadwick218 wrote:Again, I had deposited. Although WUSTL has no strict policy against depositing at multiple, some schools do ...Desert Fox wrote:What?chadwick218 wrote:WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Yes, but I was trying to wiggle more $ out of WUSTL. It wouldn't have mattered though ...Desert Fox wrote:Did you deposit at NU as well?chadwick218 wrote:Again, I had deposited. Although WUSTL has no strict policy against depositing at multiple, some schools do ...Desert Fox wrote:What?chadwick218 wrote:WUSTL ... I had deposited, but they basically ending up pulling my offer / scholarship once I was admitted to NU.
-
reasonabledoubt
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Edit: Not sure why the above matters.
Last edited by reasonabledoubt on Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
gatorlion
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:23 am
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
+1 Not sure why I even bothered to apply so early (and by early I mean October in most cases) when I would be queued up for several months while auto-admits get good news 5 days after applying.StyrofoamWar wrote:Every single school that claims rolling admissions, but then randomly reviews applications in no order at all and actually seems to avoid early applicants like the plague.
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Re: If you could punch a law school in the face, which 1 and why
Indeedreasonabledoubt wrote:So you're saying Woostle dropped you in order to erase your leveraging power... what douches.
I just that they just rightly assumed that I wouldn't attend even if given more money!
