We're A1L mad here - TLS C/O 2020 Thread [New Pole] Forum

[Hennessy]

Guys, I just found out I am also facing allegations of fathering a love child with Rielle Hunter (I'm destined for Carolina politics) and am therefore fine with taking the L on this one. Vote with gusto

i know someone else has mentioned this, but your avatar is one of the funniest moments in that shows history

[thatblondegirl]

This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

[chandhi]

This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted

[ashrice13]

This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted

I just did within the last hour. I will plead the 5th if asked to reveal who I voted for though

[ldlestrange]

This was the most difficult voting decision to date.

I still haven't voted

Same, probably going to wait until the very last moment.

[tofuspeedstar]

damn i don't even think i made it out of preliminary.

[amta]

Congrats to pozzo on his 2 rd. win streak and a finals berth!

[Mikey]

I feel like no matter who is going up against someone else, it's still hard to choose.

[chandhi]

...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

[KateMcKitten]

...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

I'm wondering the same thing. She's, like, still around, right?

[Stephylynette]

...why is Sybill the only name crossed off on the bracket?

I'm wondering the same thing. She's, like, still around, right?

Also curious. Lol

[amta]

because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

[guynourmin]

because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

Figured you'd just say you got lazy. This is a much better/funnier answer. +1

[Stephylynette]

because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

[KateMcKitten]

because sybill lost and i like sybill less than the rest of you.

Evil losers?

[thatlawlkid]

This is the hardest choice to make. might abstain.

[chandhi]

where is rigo

[chargers21]

where is rigo

Per Rigo, summer hiatus

[chandhi]

where is rigo

Per Rigo, summer hiatus

he disappeared so suddenly

the most painful goodbyes are the ones that are never explained

[Shakawkaw]

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

[Mikey]

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

[dannyswo]

7 more work days....

[Shakawkaw]

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

[guynourmin]

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

Why do you have your own PR specialist when you're obviously so good at it yourself?

[Shakawkaw]

Rigo is currently gallivanting in Mexico. I will take any and all questions re: his candidacy and platform for winning.

where does he stand on the abolishment of the 3x LSAT in 2 years rule? is his opinion positive, negative, neutral? pls

I think that Rigo would have mixed feelings on the issue. Firstly, I think he would say this is a positive change for applicants that crash and burn on a take (due to test day anxiety, illness, or some other unforeseen circumstance), especially if it was their last take. This allows applicants to cancel a bad take, and not worry about it being their last one. Secondly, I do believe that he would see this as a detriment to those who take the exam before they are ready and those who might take it 8 times in 2 years. However, I do ultimately think that Rigo would see the 3x in 2 years as overly paternalistic, and the abolishment of the rule as a positive, as it allows applicants more latitude with their takes, and how efficient they want to be, without the looming deadline weighing over their heads.

Why do you have your own PR specialist when you're obviously so good at it yourself?

Please refer all inquiries to Kronk and Co.