MBE - how'd you feel? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
jaysnooginz

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:28 am
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
Res judicata 100% applies to the government using prior crim conviction to win a civil lawsuit. (see it in tax fraud all the time)
-
History_Buff

- Posts: 10243
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:45 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
.
Last edited by History_Buff on Sat Aug 01, 2015 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
History_Buff

- Posts: 10243
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:45 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
I'm thinking of a different question then. Honestly they're starting to run together, and I don't mind that one bit.
-
Neff

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:29 am
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
Wow, 29 pages of pure neuroticism.
-
waxecstatic

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
Adequate and independent state grounds anyone?
-
konar

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:17 am
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
How do the experimental questions work? Are they the same for everyone? Are they different for different people? Is it possible that they use different variations of the same fact pattern for different groups of people? It seeems like people are remembering similar but slightly different questions(beyond just the obvious attempts to stay within TLS/MBE rules).
-
waxecstatic

- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:07 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
Honestly, look at all this f@%cking discussion over a single question regarding claim/issue preclusion. Where were all the jurisdiction questions? They weren't there. We got hosed on this mbe.
-
LAW813FL

- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
Ya I thought that was one of the "gimmies." I say gimmies, because that was one of ten that reminded me of a kaplan question lol.waxecstatic wrote:Adequate and independent state grounds anyone?
-
LAW813FL

- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
You must have missed the SITLA and Automobile exception discussion then, see pages 14-26 lolwaxecstatic wrote:Honestly, look at all this f@%cking discussion over a single question regarding claim/issue preclusion. Where were all the jurisdiction questions? They weren't there. We got hosed on this mbe.
-
jaysnooginz

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:28 am
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
.
Last edited by jaysnooginz on Sat Aug 01, 2015 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
jaysnooginz

- Posts: 168
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:28 am
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
.
Last edited by jaysnooginz on Sat Aug 01, 2015 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Watcher55

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:05 pm
Re: MBE - how'd you feel?
That shit was one of the main questions that had me raging. We're toeing the line of specificity here, so I'll just say some of the things they mentioned that the "uncle" had done and that the "brother" hadn't done in that question PISSED me off. That was made confusing just for the sake of being confusing, and it was one of the major ones where I was like I could write an essay on this shit, how am I supposed to box it into a multiple choice answer?waxecstatic wrote:And there was a similar concept tested with a guy who tripped on his nephew or whatever's toys and got injured...no liability.