Desmarais v Quinn (NYC Patent Litigation) Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Desmarais v Quinn (NYC Patent Lit)

Desmarais
4
100%
Quinn
0
No votes
Results
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 4

lawstudent355

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2026 10:40 am

Desmarais v Quinn (NYC Patent Litigation)

Post by lawstudent355 » Mon Feb 09, 2026 8:39 am

Confident I want to do patent litigation. Want early experience, to stay in big law for a long time, and possibly clerk. Concerns about Desmarais are lack of clarity re hours given the no billable hours requirement, supposedly discretionary bonuses, and stability of the practice being very patent centric.


Return to “Legal Employment”