Winston vs. Sidley? (Chicago lit) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433364
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Winston vs. Sidley? (Chicago lit)
I know Sidley has a better national reputation but it seems like in Chicago, Winston may be equal or better. I may want to work at DOJ/SEC down the line but not 100% sure.
-
gingermilkman
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:14 pm
Re: Winston vs. Sidley? (Chicago lit)
For many Winston will always be the better lit firm because Dan Webb is there. Whether you believe in Dan Webb supremacy or not is up to you. Otherwise they are both big firms in Chicago with good reputations. From my friends at Sidley, Sidley seems much closer to the Kirkland grind than its "collegial" marketing lets on. For SEC/DOJ goals partner connections are probably most helpful. Probably people in both firms who can help with that.
