
Just a little late night fun, don't hate.

Are all the other factors equal? I mean, numbers aren't the only criterion here. If their "employment rates", bar passage rates, peer assessments, etc. were all equal, then you're right, and that wouldn't make sense. But if Michigan eclipses UVA in those other categories (I'm not saying they do, I have absolutely no idea) then UVA could still have higher medians and be ranked lower.garfike wrote:How is Michigan ranked ahead of UVA when UVA's medians are both above Michigan?
jawsthegreat wrote:I'm going to UVA now so they should definitely move up to 8th.
+1 to this except I would put Texas at 14, not tied at 13of Benito Cereno wrote:1. Yale
2. Harvard
3. Stanford
4. Columbia
5. Chicago
5. NYU
7. Berkley
7. Penn
9. UVA
10. Michigan
11. Duke
11. Northwestern
13. Cornell
13. Georgetown
13. Texas
16. UCLA
16. Vanderbilt
18. USC
18. WUSTL
Median LSAT is 12.5% of the overall score and GPA is 10%, compared to academic reputation (25%), reputation among lawyers and judges (15%), employment 9 months after graduation (12%), and a bunch of other stuff.garfike wrote:How is Michigan ranked ahead of UVA when UVA's medians are both above Michigan?
jawsthegreat wrote:I'm working on a paper and am very bored, this kind of threads are perfect for times like this.
Lolrondemarino wrote:You could have given me a little hat tip for using my table.
rondemarino wrote:You could have given me a little hat tip for using my table.

ITT: Chicago becomes a regional school.rejectmaster wrote:outside of harvard, yale, stanford, and maybe columbia, doesn't it all become much more regional?
they're all still great schools but why would you go to uchicago over nyu if you wanted to be in NY or vice versa.
No, every T10 school can place you anywhere in the country. The Top 3 are just better at it.rejectmaster wrote:outside of harvard, yale, stanford, and maybe columbia, doesn't it all become much more regional?
they're all still great schools but why would you go to uchicago over nyu if you wanted to be in NY or vice versa.
ITE even Harvard and Stanford are gambles. Strong regionals at best.rejectmaster wrote:outside of harvard, yale, stanford, and maybe columbia, doesn't it all become much more regional?
they're all still great schools but why would you go to uchicago over nyu if you wanted to be in NY or vice versa.
Your been reading too many crazy TLS threads if you actually believe that.thedogship wrote:ITE even Harvard and Stanford are gambles. Strong regionals at best.rejectmaster wrote:outside of harvard, yale, stanford, and maybe columbia, doesn't it all become much more regional?
they're all still great schools but why would you go to uchicago over nyu if you wanted to be in NY or vice versa.
i wasn't clear.. what i mean to say is, assuming UChicago and NYU are peer schools, why would you move out of your target market to attend either one (assuming your target market is chicago or ny).soullesswonder wrote:ITT: Chicago becomes a regional school.rejectmaster wrote:outside of harvard, yale, stanford, and maybe columbia, doesn't it all become much more regional?
they're all still great schools but why would you go to uchicago over nyu if you wanted to be in NY or vice versa.