sorry, but compelled to chime in as i've seen this sentiment thrown around a lot recently.Superstaranonymous wrote:YP possibly?Oskosh wrote:Why would Berkeley take me and UCLA WL me? It makes no sense, since it appears Berkeley is more selective.
oskosh is below both of ucla's medians. as attractive as it is for us, the applicants, to ascribe every single WL/ding to yield protection, needless to say, it doesn't work like that.
@oskosh: the berkeley-ucla situation is weird, but admissions are not nearly so scientific as to suggest a discrete, compelling reason for this outcome.
